 |  | 
02-23-2008, 03:36 AM
| | LNPT Playa! | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 270
Chips: 1,480 | | | Thought I played this pretty well. Low stakes P*. What would you have done differently? Saw Flop | Saw Turn | Saw River | Saw Showdown | Won
PokerStars Game #15486949255: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2008/02/23 - 04:23:13 (ET)
Table 'Eos III' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Villain - $151.25 BB - $71.05
UTG - $100.70 HERO - $48.45
MP1 - $187.35
MP2 - $100.45
MP3 - $183.90 MP4 - $92.50
Button - $124.10 PREFLOP ($0.50/$1.00)
HERO is UTG+1 with Q  J 
1 fold, HERO calls $1, 3 folds, MP4 raises $1 to $2, 1 fold, Villain calls $1.50, BB calls $1, HERO calls $1. FLOP $8.00 (4 players)
Q  7  K 
Villain checks, BB checks, HERO bets $2, 1 fold, Villain calls $2, BB calls $2. TURN $14.00 (3 players)
Q  7  K  7 
Villain bets $3, BB calls $3, HERO calls $3. RIVER $23.00 (3 players)
Q  7  K  7  Q 
Villain bets $3, 1 fold, HERO raises $6 to $9, Villain calls $6.
Final Pot: $41
HERO shows [Qd Jh] (a full house, Queens full of Sevens)
HERO collects 39.05 from the pot.
Last edited by tim722 : 02-23-2008 at 03:48 AM.
| 
02-23-2008, 04:33 AM
| | In the Money | | Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 241
Chips: 1,041 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. Quote:
Originally Posted by tim722 PREFLOP ($0.50/$1.00)
HERO is UTG+1 with Q  J 
1 fold, HERO calls $1, 3 folds, MP4 raises $1 to $2, 1 fold, Villain calls $1.50, BB calls $1, HERO calls $1. I don't like much about this. Limping in early position is a weak play, especially with QJ off. folding isn't terrible but you could have made it three. FLOP $8.00 (4 players)
Q  7  K 
Villain checks, BB checks, HERO bets $2, 1 fold, Villain calls $2, BB calls $2. This is why you don't want to play QJ oop. what are you supposed to do with this flop. too many hands beat you and there is a flush draw. also if you want to lead out throw a real bet of something like 5 bucks out there. TURN $14.00 (3 players)
Q  7  K  7 
Villain bets $3, BB calls $3, HERO calls $3. you have to be thinking you are behind here, and need a queen to win or even split the pot with someone who has aq...although unlikely b/c of the passive play preflop. let's see...it will cost you 3 dollars into a 20 pot. you may think you have 2 winning outs (although it could easily be 1 split out) and maybe you win or split with another 7. 3 is such a low bet BUT you still don't have the odds. RIVER $23.00 (3 players)
Q  7  K  7  Q 
Villain bets $3, 1 fold, HERO raises $6 to $9, Villain calls $6. have to be thinking you sucked out here. the only hand that beats you is kk which would have been a weird slowplay the entire time. when the villain leads out with 3 that makes the pot 26. raising 6 is nothing. you could have made it 18 or 20 to go.
Final Pot: $41
HERO shows [Qd Jh] (a full house, Queens full of Sevens)
HERO collects 39.05 from the pot. | just a lot of small bets and passive plays. you got lucky on the river and should have raised more | 
02-23-2008, 09:50 AM
|  | ChipTalk.net Article Writer | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,161
Chips: 2,456 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. I don't limp in out of position. Then I wouldn't bet into the raiser with middle pair on a flush draw flop with 3 opponents in. On the turn, one of your opponents is obviously drawing to the flush. The other however probably has you beat, either with a K or 7, which means that catching a J isn't going to help you. That means you need one of two Qs. If you call here, since you don't have straight pot odds, you have to expect to make a lot of money when the bingo card hits. You get it on the river, but then you don't put in a real raise.
__________________
'So we go adjust the flow and everybody should know, but in case it erase remember me tell you so, No matter how we scatter in different lands you have turn and learn and try understand'- Tony Rebel
The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad.
--James Madison
| 
02-25-2008, 08:45 AM
| | LNPT Playa! | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 270
Chips: 1,480 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. Thinking about it in retrospect, I can see the points that were made. Def. got lucky here. I am working on attacking more, and trying to have less passive play. Thanks for all the comments on the hand. It's hard to analyze someone's overall style with just one hand, but I appreciate everyone providing the input. | 
02-25-2008, 10:54 AM
|  | On the lookout | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Atlanta again
Posts: 3,267
Chips: 18,645 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. Quote:
Originally Posted by tim722 Thinking about it in retrospect, I can see the points that were made. Def. got lucky here. I am working on attacking more, and trying to have less passive play. Thanks for all the comments on the hand. It's hard to analyze someone's overall style with just one hand, but I appreciate everyone providing the input. | As played (but see below), I'd say you should fold on the turn. You're most likely beat, though the pot odds are good to call. Trouble with calling is that you're probably wasting that money -- the river is unlikely to help you and you'll still be wondering what to do. You can't call a big bet on the river so why not just fold here and move on to the next hand.
BUT if you want to be more aggressive, you have to bet out more on the flop. Make a pot-sized bet here and you'll quickly see if you get check-raised by someone trapping with a King.
Then on the river you need to bet a lot more for value. BTW what did Villain have?
So hitting your Queen on the river does not mean you played it well. But take the pot and learn a lesson. Nice hand, sir. | 
02-25-2008, 09:17 PM
|  | ChipTalk.net Article Writer | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,161
Chips: 2,456 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. Quote:
Originally Posted by tomb1 As played (but see below), I'd say you should fold on the turn. You're most likely beat, though the pot odds are good to call. Trouble with calling is that you're probably wasting that money -- the river is unlikely to help you and you'll still be wondering what to do. You can't call a big bet on the river so why not just fold here and move on to the next hand. | The small turn bet gives good odds, but not good enough if you can only win with a Q. Heads up, you don't have to give the guy a K or 7, but with two in, one of them has you beat.
There's a problem with your logic here. You say the pot odds are good to call (let's assume they are), then you say you are probably wasting your money. If you have the odds, you can't be wasting your money. The likelihood of the river helping you is factored into your odds calculation. And as for wondering what to do on the river, you should have a plan. In this case it should be to fold a non-Q, and to raise at least the size of the pot if you catch one. Quote:
Originally Posted by tim722 I am working on attacking more, and trying to have less passive play. | Raise or fold preflop. Limping is passive. Attack when you have value. Your spots will typically be heads up, big draws, and big hands. Attack when raisers give up post flop (sometimes, not every time) by checking.
__________________
'So we go adjust the flow and everybody should know, but in case it erase remember me tell you so, No matter how we scatter in different lands you have turn and learn and try understand'- Tony Rebel
The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad.
--James Madison
| 
02-26-2008, 12:38 PM
| | LNPT Playa! | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 270
Chips: 1,480 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. to the best of my memory, Villain had KJos, without consulting the hand history. I can go back and look, and post later.
I'm working on the raise or fold preflop strategy. It tends to work pretty well when I remind myself to do it. | 
03-01-2008, 08:18 AM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Reading, England Age: 21
Posts: 796
Chips: 178 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. Fold pre-flop......or suck-out on river as played | 
03-01-2008, 08:20 AM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Reading, England Age: 21
Posts: 796
Chips: 178 | | | Re: Thought I played this pretty well. why are you playing with a short-stack btw? | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On Chips Per Thread View: 0 Chips Per Thread: 3 Chips Per Reply: 1 | | | |  |