[7thSeat]

Do I play to few hands?
I know this information is not very much but the tourney only lasted 129 hands and I know that some of you have very much knowleuage in the statistic area.
Would these figures describes me as a typical tight aggresive player?

These figures are quiet typical for me.

The reason I ask is that we had a discussion last live game there one dude did say that I was to tight and I do not really think so but I figure you could get me some input here.


During current Hold'em session you were dealt 129 hands and saw flop:
- 12 out of 29 times while in big blind (41%)
- 10 out of 29 times while in small blind (34%)
- 13 out of 71 times in other positions (18%)
- a total of 35 out of 129 (27%)
Pots won at showdown - 9 of 15 (60%)
Pots won without showdown - 20

Thanks.

[punk1o1]

Tight but not super tight which is good.

You dont play lots of hands but looking at your stats, the hands your playing your winning.

How did you do? Did you win?

I dont see a problem with your game but just my opinion.

[Poboy]

129 hands is not enough to tell anything. Do you have Pokertracker? Do you have Stars set up to record HH's to your hard drive? If you do, you can e-mail me your HH for that tourney if you want.

[7thSeat]

Originally Posted by punk1o1

Tight but not super tight which is good.

You dont play lots of hands but looking at your stats, the hands your playing your winning.

How did you do? Did you win?

I dont see a problem with your game but just my opinion.

Thanks for the reply.

I did won this one thanks.

Do you know the average stats? How far from supertight would you say that I am? I should maby add that only the last three hands was heads up.

[jojobinks]

Originally Posted by 7thSeat

Thanks for the reply.

I did won this one thanks.

Do you know the average stats? How far from supertight would you say that I am? I should maby add that only the last three hands was heads up.

considering that last piece of information, i'd say you're nowhere near super tight. i think you're probably limping a lot, which is bad bad bad for sngs.

[7thSeat]

Originally Posted by Poboy

129 hands is not enough to tell anything. Do you have Pokertracker? Do you have Stars set up to record HH's to your hard drive? If you do, you can e-mail me your HH for that tourney if you want.

I only got my place sent to my e-mail. I used to get HH as well but not the last month.
I know that 129 hands is not much but thanks for your kind offer.

[smoore]

Blinds look fine to me. If you're running good then 18% in other positions is great. If you're running bad, it's too many hands.

And yeah, limping in a SnG is bad mojo, leading to tears. (might not relate to this thread)

[7thSeat]

Originally Posted by jojobinks

considering that last piece of information, i'd say you're nowhere near super tight. i think you're probably limping a lot, which is bad bad bad for sngs.

Thanks JoJo,

Sounds good that you do not think I am super tight.
In this game I didn't limp many hands at all since the dudes after me where blind thiefs. You are right though that I do like to limp on small pairs and suited connectors depending on posision and the other players style.

It is really to bad that your tournies are so late since it would be really fun to play with you all on some occation.

[smoore]

Originally Posted by 7thSeat

It is really to bad that your tournies are so late since it would be really fun to play with you all on some occation.

If by "fun" you mean, "I like to light $10 bills on fire!" then yeah, it's fun

Seriously though, the people who are regulars in the CT tournaments are GOOD. Better than me, therefore I like greener pastures!

[7thSeat]

Originally Posted by smoore

Blinds look fine to me. If you're running good then 18% in other positions is great. If you're running bad, it's too many hands.

And yeah, limping in a SnG is bad mojo, leading to tears. (might not relate to this thread)

Thanks for the input Smoore.