 |
 |

04-11-2011, 10:01 AM
|
|
In the Money
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 295
|
|
|
Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions.
Played $1/$2 the other night. Mostly regs with one new guy. He sat directly to my right and I have never played with him before. I forget his name so we will call him angry Joe--or AJ for short.
1st hand of the night..folds to him in c/o($100) and he limps. I($200) bet to $12 with AKo. Flop is 789rbw --he open shoves. I've seen many folks shove a draw here and with his limp a 10 was very much in his range. I would think if he had 77 88 99 he would have raised in c/o, so I wasnt really scared of trips although like I said 1st hand with guy so who knows but IMO no one in their right mind shoves a made straight here with out a FD on the board. So I think for a moment and call.
He turns over Q10 and missed his open ender. He b1tched for about 20minutes that I called him and I didn't say very much back to him.
About an hour later, AJ($150) in c/o limps again and I($450) raise to $12 with KJo. Flop is 37Qrbw, he checks and I bet $20..he takes a few moments and calls. turn is a 9s putting two s on the board. I fire $50...he calls. Now Im pretty sure he has the Q or maybe FD and I need to bingo the K or shove a non-As on the river. If an under shows I will prob just fold behind his river bet. River is an Ah and I shove. He only has 70ish left but I still thought it was enough to get a fold since I raised PF and had shown big A's alot in previous hands. He tanks then calls...he had 66. I didn't say a word but figured he thought I was fuming. My read was he was weak the whole hand but figured he had to at least have Qx and he called my turn bet. I was a bit perplexed since if he had Q on flop he didnt raise or bet out on turn. So what I thought he must have didn't really add up in my mind to his betting and after seeing 66 I realized why.
3 hands later. Im UTG($300) look down and see AA. I kinda hate playing AA/KK UTG. I always tell myself to get tricky and limp but instead I always raise and hope for the best. I just dont want to tank AA and think..you shoulda raised PF dummy. So I raise to $8 and hope for the best. It folds around to AJ($300) in the BB and he mentions how he likes to defend so he calls. I really cannot range him figuring the 1st hand of the night had him playing at me a bit different then most players and the pocket 6 hand kinda confirmed it to me. Flop was Js2h6h. He bets $30 which thru me off a bit. So I thought for a second and since I had the Ah figured he wasnt on a Fd and must have had a weak J and was trying to scare me off. Most cases I might just flat here but from previous hands with dude I think looking mad and shoving may look the weakest...so I shove. He says I figured you would think I was just bluffing and calls with J8o. I told him that I was praying he wasnt and the AA held up. He gets up and says nothing and leaves.
Just wanted to discuss how ABC playing if fine with a lot of folks but you really have to be villain specific with a lot of hands. 99% of the time there is now way I shove AA in a pot like that but sometimes with reads it just makes sense.
Last edited by Duckbutter48; 04-11-2011 at 12:00 PM.
|
 Poker Coaching That TRANSFORMS Your Game!

04-11-2011, 10:18 AM
|
|
Old Man Sweater
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,189
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
don't mean to troll up your thread with my terminology nittiness, but if you raise PF after a limper it isn't a 3-bet; it's just a raise.
|

04-11-2011, 10:28 AM
|
|
In the Money
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 295
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
yea, all that typing wore me out. I took the 3 out of the post...Hope that helps ya
|

04-11-2011, 10:30 AM
|
|
Old Man Sweater
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,189
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckbutter48
yea, all that typing wore me out. I took the 3 out of the post...Hope that helps ya
|
yeah i definitely trolled that up - sorry
|

04-11-2011, 11:40 AM
|
 |
Admin & Postmeister General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 31,280
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
I'm a bit confused about the second hand, did he check every street? He's on your right but it sounded like you acted first in that hand.
__________________
.
-- The single greatest threat to the United States comes not from foreign terrorists, but from domestic imbeciles. - Ben Franklin c.1787
* For support of any kind please open a thread in our private Site Support Forum. Mods and Admins will not respond to support questions sent via email or PM.
|

04-11-2011, 11:57 AM
|
|
In the Money
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 295
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
Yea, he checked each street.
|

04-11-2011, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Degen Gatekeeper
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Boston, NH
Age: 40
Posts: 7,069
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
I would have caught the 8. 5th level Metacatching. Chapter 4.
__________________
gambol where next? okay.
|

04-11-2011, 04:01 PM
|
|
In the Money
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 295
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
Quote:
Originally Posted by guinness
I would have caught the 8. 5th level Metacatching. Chapter 4.
|
Yea but since your different villain I would have just flatted your flop bet and checked behind on turn and then folded when you tried to take me down value street on the river.
Thats Chapter 5.
|

04-11-2011, 06:16 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 769
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
I've been thinking lately that I need to be in hands when there is a very weak player at the table. I have seriously changed my game in these instances, and I will open up my range quite a bit. A lot of weak players are overbluffers or calling stations, and you can isolate them or at least get three handed if you aggressively play this way. Sorry if this is a dumb post, but I am mostly a limit player and no limit cash games were never my favorite. I only play now because limit games are so hard to find at a higher level. So I play 1-2, but usually pretty deep. To me, scared money is about the worst thing you can play with in any poker game.
|

04-11-2011, 07:53 PM
|
|
In the Money
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 295
|
|
|
Re: Metagame reads in homegame. Why history with villain is so important in decisions
Im with ya Joe. I started out as tight was right and still play very nitty early but when fish is deep and IM in position I come along with a ton of hands.
I 3-bet scared money the other night when scared money was in mid-position and 3x raised. I had 23o..Sound retarded but the man check/folds most flops so you just bet flop and take it down 75% of the time. Almost every other player at table I happily fold 23o but iso-ing/c-beting scared money is def. +ev.
|
 |

| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
 |