[Sir Flopalot]

Originally Posted by JM

But that can be a problem because doing that tends to leave behind some of the adhesive, which will then show as a lump under the new label. So you'll end up having to find a solvent that won't hurt the chip and clean off the old adhesive, etc etc. Big PIA trust me. Just put it over the existing inlay and then if you want to sell them again later on, you can just remove the labels and they are back to Neimanns again!

I think it depends...when I removed the labels from a few of my CP@S (which are also BJ S2 chips) there was little or no adhesive residue remaining. And in any case, I think if you are going to the trouble of removing all of the labels, then you'd probably want to go with the thicker labels similar to what is already on the chips...much easier to apply and orient and will closer to "factory". But I agree that it might be simpler to leave the existing inlay and use a thinner label. Just my $0.02.

I'll be following this thread as I'm also thinking of relabelling some BJ chips

[JM]

Yeah but I'd still go with leaving the originals intact so you don't lose resale value. I agree though, if you're removing the inlays, go with thicker labels.

[Hooligan350]

Well - I've decided to go ahead with the thin labels (seems like a reasonable idea to save the time unlabeling and retain the resale utility). I visited Hogwild's site (I think anyways ... I hope it is personalpokerchips.com) and sent him a message via intersite messaging. Hopefully I can get this project underway quickly and come up with a final product. Thanks again for all your suggessions and tips.

[links_slayer]

What do your labels look like?

[Hooligan350]

As soon as mock ups are available - I'll post