Yeah, I can barely squeeze 19 into a Chipco rack.
The one thing I don't care for is the edgespots, too friggin' busy. The 4 spots is too much IMO, even on paulsons. The edgespots on these also have colors from other chips, further making hard to tell what chips are in the stack...I forgot to take pics

like I said I was going to, oh well....maybe later. I hate when chips are too busy, it's not bad if it's one denom or two with busy edges, as long as soem values are different you can make them out. These don't feel bad, a tad light probably 8.8g-9g and the diameter is a bit larger by about 1/2 mm.
They really need labels though, the centers are very smooth and plastic-like with injection type points on some...or maybe just the injection points tranferred from the molds. They'd be a decent set for a non clay set, if you could get some labelled for a total of 35¢ chip it would be a good econmical set, better than NExgens and Fauxs (Gasp! though I was never too impressed with fauxs...but they are cheap, that's all they have going IMO) In solid format like PI has I bet they'd be decent...I'm such a friggin' chip snob now though....I couldn't play with them...I know I would wander to something else( like I typically do...hell I've gone through paulson, ASM, TRK and BC too, so it's not like I'm saying they're trash, just know I would be unsatisfied in a week).
Further on the chip snob topic, I shuffle these Progens for a few minutes and something just feels ..not right, I feel dirty. Then I swap over to my T-mold tournies and ...ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...that's the way a chip is supposed to feel...and those suckers are so chalky and not worn in yet, but they still feel better...not sure what it is.