 | 
06-26-2005, 06:59 AM
|  | Big Stack | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Kissimmee,Florida Age: 58
Posts: 1,142
Chips: 2,046 | | | oiled chips weight Just curious does oiling add any significant weight to the chips? | 
06-26-2005, 11:34 AM
|  | On the Bubble | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 125
Chips: 224 | | | I would say no. So little oil is required on each chip, that the weight should be no consideration. | 
06-26-2005, 03:07 PM
| | In the Money | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 305
Chips: 303 | | | I tried it on my scale (0.001g resolution) No change. Obviously, weight is being added, but it's significance is immeasurable. However the slickness it adds to the chip is measureable.
. | 
06-26-2005, 04:51 PM
|  | World Series Champ | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,367
Chips: 92 | | | What percentage is slickness increase by when you oil the chips.?I think the slickness would decrease with time. | 
06-26-2005, 05:27 PM
| | In the Money | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 305
Chips: 303 | | | Much data still needs to be taken, but preliminary experiments indicate that slickness may go up by possibly double-digit percentages- depending on the type of chip.
And if my chipco classics's and JB05's are any indicator, slickness actually increases with wear. I found this observation rather striking, as I expected the opposite to be true. In the chipco's case however, I also noticed that skin oils on worn chips seem to make them 'stickier' than new chips with skin oil. The Paulson's seem somewhat more immune to this. When I tested them, they were all equally washed to achieve some kind of comparitive standard, and I didn't think of a before/after test at the time. Honestly, I didn't expect the variation I am now seeing. I am utterly convinced now that other variables (oil, wear, etc.) play a factor, perhaps a large one. The problem is- how do you specify/quantify the data? e.g.-How much wear? What kind of oil? Oiled/new, oiled/worn? And on...
. | 
06-26-2005, 06:43 PM
|  | World Series Champ | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,367
Chips: 92 | | | I can see how worn in chips could be slicker because the surface would be more smooth. On a new chip it would be rougher.
I was just wondering if a newly oil chip would be less slick after a period of time as the oil soaks into the chip and less oil on the surface. | 
06-26-2005, 08:41 PM
| | In the Money | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 305
Chips: 303 | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by dad604 I was just wondering if a newly oil chip would be less slick after a period of time as the oil soaks into the chip and less oil on the surface. | It certainly sounds plausible, but I have no supportive data at this time.
What I've started wondering- is if GPI, Chipco, ASM and other manufacturers have duplicated, or are using a similar method in their R&D or engineering departments?
. | 
07-29-2005, 09:19 PM
|  | Big Stack | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Kissimmee,Florida Age: 58
Posts: 1,142
Chips: 2,046 | | | HAS anyone let a clay poker chip sit and soak in mineral oil for a prolonged time and see how it holds up,and if it soaked up enough oil to change the weight of the chip? | 
07-29-2005, 11:24 PM
|  | On the lookout | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Atlanta again
Posts: 3,267
Chips: 18,394 | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DEEJAY HAS anyone let a clay poker chip sit and soak in mineral oil for a prolonged time and see how it holds up,and if it soaked up enough oil to change the weight of the chip? | I put a freshly-cleaned Paulson casino chip (classic inlay) in oil overnight.
After wiping off well, it was the same as the other oiled chips -- no detectable soak-in. The "clay" material just is not that porous IMO.
And as far as the original question -- no added weight with oiling. | 
07-30-2005, 12:43 PM
|  | Big Stack | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Kissimmee,Florida Age: 58
Posts: 1,142
Chips: 2,046 | | | Thanks tomb for the heads up on this,answered my question completely! | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off Chips Per Thread View: 0 Chips Per Thread: 6 Chips Per Reply: 1 | | | |  |