[JoseRijo]

You're right, it was Dolomite's friend. But he wasn't angle shooting. He just
thought the game was too juicy to leave.

[guinness]

Originally Posted by JoseRijo

You're right, it was Dolomite's friend. But he wasn't angle shooting. He just thought the game was too juicy to leave.

True.

[TX_kiwi]

Originally Posted by osumike11379

EyeHeartYou said, "guys i gotta go"
EyeHeartYou said, "83 of spades call me"

Its one thing to say I gotta go and push all in (nebulous comment - peep might merely need to go to the bathroom....).

It is another thing again to say "83 of spades call me" when you are holding pocket 10s (yeah, I know that comment is also nebulous and can be interepted other ways) .

IMO it is a totally different thing and crosses my moral boundary to do both together "83 of spades call me" in conjunction with the earlier "guys i gotta go". How far down the bluffing continuum do you stick your 'no-go" point? This one crosses mine.

If someone did this at our home game they'd be run out of town.

[JCTC]

What he said does rub the wrong way. I agree that it is across the line.

Originally Posted by TX_kiwi

Its one thing to say I gotta go and push all in (nebulous - peep might merely need to go to the bathroom....).

It is another thing again to say "83 of spades call me" when you are holding pocket 10s (yeah, I know that comment is also nebulous and can be interepted other ways) .

IMO it is a totally different thing and crosses my moral boundary to do both together "83 of spades call me" in conjunction with the earlier "guys i gotta go" . How far down the bluffing continuum do you stick youre 'no-go" point? This one crosses mine.

If someone did this at our home game they'd be run out of town.

[monkeydog]

Originally Posted by Stevo

I have done this - but when I do - I actually have to leave and I will say - I have to go NEXT HAND I am going all in regardless and then wait till the next round.

Why? Why not just sit out? Is it fair to the other players that you double one guy up? Do you care about fairness?

Also just by sitting out you may hit the money.

[noelsarchs]

I like to see some pr$*k do that in the old days when Doyle was running around the country dodging guns and thieves. That person would get shot right at the table.

[Irish Se7en]

Originally Posted by noelsarchs

I like to see some pr$*k do that in the old days when Doyle was running around the country dodging guns and thieves. That person would get shot right at the table.

It's online poker and because of the anonymity some people just don't care. It's not the old days, it's now, there's no table, there's a keyboard and a monitor. People act differently behind a keyboard, now you mix in gambling even at these stakes and it's like sweet old granny but now she's behind a steering wheel. Now she's the aggressive driver, cussing at people who cut her off or drive too slow for her liking. Some people just act differently when taken out of their normal settings. I'm not condoning either action but I can understand it.


Also, even without the b.s. line of "guys i gotta go".."83 of spades call me" line, pcvandelay might have called EyeHeartYou A.I. anyways. Who knows.

Don't sweat the small stuff.

[jdunford]

Originally Posted by Irish Se7en

Also, even without the b.s. line of "guys i gotta go".."83 of spades call me" line, pcvandelay might have called EyeHeartYou A.I. anyways. Who knows.

Don't sweat the small stuff.

And ironically enough, had he actually held 83, he would still have won the hand...

[PhilTheThrill14]

What he was saying was - he wanted 83 spades to call him as he has that hand dominated.

In reality - just turn chat off - having chat on for those level of tournies is useless and can only be a distraction.

[JCTC]

Lol. Indeed.

Originally Posted by jdunford

And ironically enough, had he actually held 83, he would still have won the hand...