[BlakeC27]

Most of my play online in S&Gs and am wondering if people out there prefer either a time based or number of hand based structure?

[FSU88]

I've only played time based tournaments. Now, most of the ones I play are low stake Turbo's, which might as well be hand based. As each round is only 5 minutes, and some players take so long that only a few hands may be played per round. I only do that because often I do not have much time to play, and cash games are not my forte'. I prefer longer round structures though.

I've never played a game that is structured by the number of hands.

[BlakeC27]

Originally Posted by FSU88

I've only played time based tournaments. Now, most of the ones I play are low stake Turbo's, which might as well be hand based. As each round is only 5 minutes, and some players take so long that only a few hands may be played per round. I only do that because often I do not have much time to play, and cash games are not my forte'. I prefer longer round structures though.

I've never played a game that is structured by the number of hands.

I hate Turbo's.



But in saying that my first ever win in a S&G came in a Turbo after I signed up for what I thought was a regular S&G and was wondering why the levels were increasing so fast.

[jamby]

Definitely time-based.

-jamby

[dad604]

I don't care but lean towards # of hands.

[smoore]

I don't care. I used to tear up party's hand-based SnG's, I have a slightly lower ROI at 'stars for the same time period. Not sure if that's the quality of play or the structure. I don't play party anymore so I can't comment on how it changed the games.