[DEEJAY]

some of the casino's i've played in have posted 2-4-8 which is what the original poster meant!

[eguie921]

snuix114 thanks for the assist but that is not what I was looking for. I've searched Robert's rules and couldn't find what I was looking for. I'm looking for something in writting that says like this for limit:

"In a limit 3/6 game, blinds are 1 & 3 (if using 2 blinds)and PF plus FLOP, the min bet is 3. On 4th and 5th the min bet is 6." or something to that affect.

But for a No limit Tournament.

So, something like" In a NL tournament, when the blinds are 5/10, PF plus the FLOP the min bet is 10. 4th and 5th street is ..."

Just can't find anything. I can find it on the Limit point but not the NL tourney.

[snuix114]

Originally Posted by eguie921

snuix114 thanks for the assist but that is not what I was looking for. I've searched Robert's rules and couldn't find what I was looking for. I'm looking for something in writting that says like this for limit:

"In a limit 3/6 game, blinds are 1 & 3 (if using 2 blinds)and PF plus FLOP, the min bet is 3. On 4th and 5th the min bet is 6." or something to that affect.

But for a No limit Tournament.

So, something like" In a NL tournament, when the blinds are 5/10, PF plus the FLOP the min bet is 10. 4th and 5th street is ..."

Just can't find anything. I can find it on the Limit point but not the NL tourney.

Why do you need a direct quote from somewhere explaining it in layman's terms? Why not simply write it how you think your players will best understand the rule and print it up?

I'm not being sarcastic, I just can't find it anywhere worded the way you want it. The rule is there in Robert's Rules, just not how you want it stated.

[smoore]

Originally Posted by eguie921

So, something like" In a NL tournament, when the blinds are 5/10, PF plus the FLOP the min bet is 10. 4th and 5th street is ..."

10, same as the flop. big bet poker is different from structured poker.

[eguie921]

Originally Posted by snuix114

... Why not simply write it how you think your players will best understand the rule and print it up?

I'm not being sarcastic, ...

Nah you are not being sarcastic at all. I feel the same way. I just wanted somewhere I can point someone too in case someone wants to challange my writting. It's in Robert's, I guess I'm trying to be too much of a lawyer on the subject and get more specifics. I guess I'm still on tilt on that guy really more for his approach than anything. So, just incase, we get another, I can just say, look this is the house rules so be it, if you want look it up here. that's it.

You know what, I'm done with it. Thanks everyone for the assist as always and helping me come to my senses.