Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wedge Rock Yeah, standard image size works better, IMHO... Unfortunately, my images are 100 x 100, so when blown up to 200 x 200 size, they look pixelated, but oh well. |
I have to redo some of my images anyway, so that's no problem. The ones I have from my old scanner are off the charts, and when I started doing the new scanner, I started them off at 119x119 (the scanner's default); then I noticed chipguide.com uses 158x158 - actual chip size - so my newer scans of individual chips are all that size. That size should work well for the trader site, I think. It's just the ones with multiples that I'll need to rework.
Quote:
|
Rose, if you want to show both sides of the chip, just make sure the h = w... You'll have alot of extra space, but at least both sides will come through...
|
If I'm understanding this right, you mean that the height and width measurement should be the same, right? I'm having a blonde day, so I'm a bit slow. And no, I'm not blonde, so I've probably just offended a few people here, sorry.
Quote:
|
I (C) my images to dissaude others from using them... I don't care if they are posted here from time to time (which they have been), but I don't want another chip site to post all of them, using up all of image shack's bandwidth and forcing image shack to pull the pictures from me... I have too many images on my site, I could never host them all!
|
Makes perfect sense to me. I didn't ask that to single anyone out or start a copyright crusade, since I totally understand why it'd be easier to use pre-existing images (lord knows I don't want to have to spend tons of hours re-doing my own scans). My preference would be to use chipguide's images, but I remember Gaming Ore had a problem with using them here without proper acknowledgment (which is only right), so using them on Wolfpack's page, I'd think, would somehow need to be similarly acknowledged.
Linear Mode
