 | 
12-09-2005, 11:20 AM
|  | Short Stack | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Canada Age: 29
Posts: 35
Chips: 38 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker I like this concept very much and I think the initial guidelines set by w16227 are a good starting point. We can most definitely get people to back a player from this board and the suggestion of the table leader from Jan to may is a great idea. I would be in for this type of setup. | 
12-09-2005, 11:36 AM
|  | Prick | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 6,172
Chips: 47 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker Sounds good, but expenses can be a bit subjective. Maybe some extra cash to try a satellite to gain entry cheaper and maybe play in a $1500 butin tourney or something. Nice to get someone acclimated with a smaller tourney to start.
__________________
I'm a people person
| 
12-09-2005, 11:38 AM
|  | On the lookout | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Atlanta again
Posts: 3,267
Chips: 18,645 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker I would contribute to one of our sharp players (that certainly excludes me) going to Vegas.
If he cashes, I would like to get paid back then give the player a larger percentage than the shareholders. He (or she!) did all the work and had to live with the gawd-awful pressure he'd feel from all of us backers! Just my 2¢ -- I'm actually OK with any arrangement the group thinks is right. | 
12-09-2005, 11:46 AM
|  | Poker Nerd (and Admin) | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: bottom pair and a flush draw Age: 35
Posts: 10,642
Chips: 18,504 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker i'd buy a piece | 
12-09-2005, 12:05 PM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Gilbert, AZ Age: 30
Posts: 735
Chips: 634 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker Here is an idea.
Have one person be the "Money Holder". Every week when there is a tournament. Every entrant could send $10 a piece to the "Money Holder". Then after Jan - May is complete the leader gets all the money in the pot to use to go to the main event.
At the main event. If said player cashes he keeps half. The rest is divided into equal shares depending on the number of events each player has played in.
I think that makes sense?  | 
12-09-2005, 12:10 PM
|  | Poker Spellcaster | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NLHE cash table Age: 39
Posts: 1,243
Chips: 14,006 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker I will be playing in at least one WSOP event again this year. Possibly the big one if the bankroll really gets rolling, but its still looking like earlier events at this point.
As a side note on selecting the player, the CT tournaments, while very competitive and very fun, are probably not the best indicator of performance in a WSOP tournament. I do believe that there are several regulars here that could hold their own in a big tournament and do very well, but the blind pressure and luck factor is much higher in the weekly CT tournament based on the PStars structure. There's probably no better way to determine a Chiptalk representative than our regular tournaments, but I thought that I'd throw this out -- while both are NLHE tournaments, its really a different breed of poker.
(And if you really want to sponsor someone with the best chance of making $$$, put the player in the NLHE cash games at the Rio during the WSOP instead of the tournament. There are some wild, aggressive, wealthy players in those games, and lots of internet-trained kids, who just aren't very good. But that doesn't get ad exposure, that's not a tournament, etc.) | 
12-09-2005, 12:30 PM
|  | ChipTalk.net Article Writer | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lake Orion, MI Age: 38
Posts: 5,337
Chips: 5,848 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker What about some sort of live tourney with 1 or 2 steps to a CT final table which leads to the WSOP?
Ignore the whole logistics thing for the moment but would this be a better indicator of who should go than the weekly online tourney's? You are basically looking at a couple of live tournaments versus a season or so of online tournamnets. Which is a better indicator?
I have some ideas regarding logistics but I'll save those for later. | 
12-09-2005, 12:40 PM
|  | Poker Nerd (and Admin) | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: bottom pair and a flush draw Age: 35
Posts: 10,642
Chips: 18,504 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker Quote: |
Originally Posted by hachkc What about some sort of live tourney with 1 or 2 steps to a CT final table which leads to the WSOP?
Ignore the whole logistics thing for the moment but would this be a better indicator of who should go than the weekly online tourney's? You are basically looking at a couple of live tournaments versus a season or so of online tournamnets. Which is a better indicator?
I have some ideas regarding logistics but I'll save those for later. | clearly we'll eventually need to have a CT live event. i like where you're going with this. | 
12-09-2005, 01:12 PM
|  | Design Addict | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Location: Location Age: 41
Posts: 1,796
Chips: 10,069 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker Quote: |
Originally Posted by SpeakEasy As a side note on selecting the player, the CT tournaments, while very competitive and very fun, are probably not the best indicator of performance in a WSOP tournament. | Can you do deep stack private tourneys yet on PS? Are there any that available at set times that could be used & still rank according to finish?
Like the idea of a live game but just don't know how you work out logistics... say have 9+ games in diff places to field a final table(s)?
__________________ "If you can't buy 'em, design 'em" "Chance favors only the prepared mind" - Louis Pasteur Chuck Norris doesn't throw up... he throws down! | 
12-09-2005, 01:19 PM
|  | Poker Spellcaster | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NLHE cash table Age: 39
Posts: 1,243
Chips: 14,006 | | | Re: 2006 WSOP Chiptalker Quote: |
Originally Posted by Fins Can you do deep stack private tourneys yet on PS? Are there any that available at set times that could be used & still rank according to finish? | No private deep stack option right now for the private tourneys. PS response to me did not indicate if this will become an option. Probably not, since they want us grinding the rake, rather than playing a looong tourney that more closely resembles real poker. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On Chips Per Thread View: 0 Chips Per Thread: 3 Chips Per Reply: 1 | | | |  |