 | |
View Poll Results: Favorite Chips | |
Chip #1: Dark Blue, Horizon Blue, Sky Blue
|    | 30 | 52.63% | |
Chip #2: Blood Red, White, Horizon Blue
|    | 14 | 24.56% | |
Chip #3: Blood Red, Dark Green, Canary Yellow
|    | 12 | 21.05% | |
Chip #4: Hot Pink, Light Pink, White
|    | 14 | 24.56% | |
Chip #5: Light Blue, Dolphin Blue, Sky Blue
|    | 20 | 35.09% | |
Chip #6: Arc Yellow, Almond, Adobe
|    | 25 | 43.86% | |
Chip #7: Radiant Red, Grey, Radiant Red
| | 10 | 17.54% | |
Chip #8: Plum, Light Pink, Plum
| | 19 | 33.33% | |
Chip #9: Grey, Saturn Yellow, Horizon Blue
| | 11 | 19.30% |
05-29-2006, 07:29 PM
| | ChipTalk.net Sponsor! | | Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,270
Chips: 4,014
| | | ||DECIDED|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
Last edited by Sidepot : 05-30-2006 at 08:20 PM.
|
05-29-2006, 07:32 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA Age: 30
Posts: 1,699
Chips: 1
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST (General Election Chips 1-9)
1,3,4 |
05-30-2006, 02:30 PM
|  | Big Stack | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: San Francisco Age: 34
Posts: 1,612
Chips: 1,309
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
What's the criteria for determining which chips advance to round #2? Top 3? Anything with 15 or more votes? I didn't see anything explaining how the next step is reached, just a "vote for those worthy" message. |
05-30-2006, 02:32 PM
|  | Mod & Postmeister General | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 14,899
Chips: 12,257
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
I was wondering that too.
__________________
Member: 3U Crew |
05-30-2006, 02:48 PM
|  | On the Bubble | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Columbia Age: 23
Posts: 156
Chips: 117
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Hopin2Steal What's the criteria for determining which chips advance to round #2? Top 3? Anything with 15 or more votes? I didn't see anything explaining how the next step is reached, just a "vote for those worthy" message. | I don't think an actual number of votes would be very fair, considering there are different numbers of voters on each poll. Perhaps the criteria is some percentage of votes for that poll, maybe 30% or something like that. |
05-30-2006, 03:04 PM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Maryland Age: 37
Posts: 840
Chips: 1,375
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
Quote: |
Originally Posted by HebbNH I don't think an actual number of votes would be very fair, considering there are different numbers of voters on each poll. Perhaps the criteria is some percentage of votes for that poll, maybe 30% or something like that. | Not true. Since people were allowed to vote for as many or as few as they liked, it necessarily follows that the ones with fewer votes are less popular.
But ditto H2S and JM. |
05-30-2006, 03:12 PM
| | On the Bubble | | Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 159
Chips: 149
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
Vote for #3...Base Colors Rule! |
05-30-2006, 04:14 PM
|  | Chip and a Chair | | Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Chips: 7
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
2, 3, 6, 9 |
05-30-2006, 05:09 PM
|  | ChipTalk.net Article Writer | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sunny Southern California Age: 27
Posts: 3,105
Chips: 3,137
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
C'mon people. This chip is HOTT!!!! 
__________________  |
05-30-2006, 07:17 PM
| | On the Bubble | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Columbia Age: 23
Posts: 156
Chips: 117
| | | Re: ||LIVE|| 5/29 5:30PM PST ($100 General Election Chips 1-9)
Quote: |
Originally Posted by FL70 Not true. Since people were allowed to vote for as many or as few as they liked, it necessarily follows that the ones with fewer votes are less popular. | This is true if there are the same number of voters in each poll, but if only 50 people vote in one poll, while 60 vote in another, then the sheer number of votes is an unfair indicator. The only way it wouldn't be skewed is if, by pure coincidence, none of the extra 10 voters in the larger poll would have voted for any chip(s) in the smaller poll. See what I'm saying? In the event that the advancing chips are selected as, for example, the top 3 from each poll, then it doesn't make any difference whether you go by number of votes or percentage of votes. On the other hand, if "winners" are chosen based on the top 10 from all polls, then chips in the polls with more voters have an obvious unfair advantage.
EDIT: This seems a legitimate concern to me since there are just 50 voters in the chip # 28-36 poll, but there are 61 in the chip # 19-27 poll as of now.
Last edited by HebbNH : 05-30-2006 at 07:28 PM.
|  | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
Chips Per Thread View: 0 Chips Per Thread: 3 Chips Per Reply: 1 | | |
| |
