 | |
View Poll Results: Which chip(s) in this set needs the most work to get "just right?" (ordered from TL) | |
1
|    | 33 | 34.02% | |
2
|    | 10 | 10.31% | |
3
|    | 39 | 40.21% | |
4
|    | 51 | 52.58% | |
5
|    | 26 | 26.80% | |
6
|    | 23 | 23.71% | |
7
| | 45 | 46.39% | |
8
| | 37 | 38.14% |
03-23-2006, 04:24 PM
| | In the Money | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: MN
Posts: 314
Chips: 223
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Anybody else think the triple spots in general are just a bit too busy/gaudy for a set that is supposed to exude class/luxury? I think I'd want them on one chip at most, and think about bringing some of the other "cleaner" patterns in (such as [4 1/4 w 1/4] and [4 1/2 w 1/4]). |
03-23-2006, 04:24 PM
|  | World Series Final Table | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Santee, CA (San Diego) Age: 40
Posts: 2,547
Chips: 2,924
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Better or worse?  |
03-23-2006, 04:38 PM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Gilbert, AZ Age: 30
Posts: 735
Chips: 634
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
The White spot on every chips makes it look like an optical illusion. I do not like a white spot on every chip! |
03-23-2006, 06:23 PM
|  | Mod/YTOC#3 Winner | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Pokerchip Nirvana Age: 30
Posts: 4,970
Chips: 9,231
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Quote: |
Originally Posted by burnvalley The White spot on every chips makes it look like an optical illusion. I do not like a white spot on every chip! | I agree, that's not working. What happened to the progression for the black chip? Things go backwards now!
Sorry to sound so negative, but this needs more than just "tweaking". It's a good start, but I think it's even further away than it was before. Although, I do like your .25 chip. Simple, not too messy.
People are probably going to flame me to death, but I'm going to repost my colour scheme on your original spot progression (except for the .25/NCV white chip). 
Any takers?  |
03-23-2006, 06:49 PM
| | World Series Final Table | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Santee, CA (San Diego) Age: 40
Posts: 2,547
Chips: 2,924
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Understood.
As far as progressions go here was my first stab at making edgespots make sense as they go up, except for the last NCV chip.
IGNORE THE COLORS, just look at the edgespots and tell me if this progression makes more sense to ya'll.
Of course you will note that I have a "thing" for white edgespots, and these colors don't scream opulence or class, but I thought the edgespots at least had a decent progression, no?  |
03-23-2006, 07:04 PM
|  | In the Money | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 262
Chips: 275
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Maybe a moderator could step in and let us know what, in God's name, is going on in this phase. Are we seriously determining an order in which to tweak the chips? Will all the chips be tweaked? Does tweaking mean a complete restart? And then, will the tweaking continue after an inlay is chosen?
I hate to be a whiner...but I'm having trouble seeing the utility. In truth, these are complete reworks.
Anyone? |
03-23-2006, 07:09 PM
| | World Series Final Table | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Santee, CA (San Diego) Age: 40
Posts: 2,547
Chips: 2,924
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Quote: |
Originally Posted by grath Maybe a moderator could step in and let us know what, in God's name, is going on in this phase. Are we seriously determining an order in which to tweak the chips? Will all the chips be tweaked? Does tweaking mean a complete restart? And then, will the tweaking continue after an inlay is chosen?
I hate to be a whiner...but I'm having trouble seeing the utility. In truth, these are complete reworks.
Anyone? |
I feel your pain...
I'm just trying to figure out what constitutes a "tweak" myself.
I figure if we fire enough bullets out there, one of 'em's gonna hit something. |
03-23-2006, 07:20 PM
|  | ChipTalk.net Article Writer | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Rochester, MA Age: 40
Posts: 2,511
Chips: 7,749
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
I belive a moderator did step in - and he asked you to take part in a poll. Posting total redos and such was not what he asked for. This has caused some confusion.....IMO. |
03-23-2006, 07:33 PM
| | In the Money | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 262
Chips: 275
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Quote: |
Originally Posted by PhilTheThrill14 I belive a moderator did step in - and he asked you to take part in a poll. Posting total redos and such was not what he asked for. This has caused some confusion.....IMO. | A poll for which chips people disliked the most. Thanks for clearing that up. |
03-23-2006, 07:38 PM
| | Short Stack | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Niles, Ohio
Posts: 19
Chips: 19
| | | Re: Protégé Stage 3 - Tweaking the Set
Quote: |
Originally Posted by PhilTheThrill14 I belive a moderator did step in - and he asked you to take part in a poll. Posting total redos and such was not what he asked for. This has caused some confusion.....IMO. | That is why I posted a "tweak" of my set here: http://www.chiptalk.net/forum/showthread.php?p=246773
Go take a look  |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
Chips Per Thread View: 0 Chips Per Thread: 3 Chips Per Reply: 1 | | |
| |
