[Sidepot]

One vote per CT member, and we "call a winner" under the following pre-determined lopsided conditions:

· 70% After 40: If one chip has a 70% majority after a minimum of 40 votes, we "call the winner" (min vote would be 28 to 12 votes)

· 60% After 50: If one chip has a 60% majority after a minimum of 50 votes, we "call the winner" (min vote would be 30 to 20 votes)

Let the voting begin!

Magus_23's Grand Entry: "Archimage Grand"



Extraholes Grand Entry: "Oak Park Grand"

[Irish Se7en]

When I look at Extraholes design for some reason it reminds me of looking through a kaleidoscope when I was younger.

[jdunford]

This one's tough. It's my favourite of Magus's Archimage series, but I really like Extraholes' design as well. I'm looking forward to seeing full mock-ups (with centres) on these!

[JessterCPA]

Originally Posted by Irish Se7en

When I look at Extraholes design for some reason it reminds me of looking through a kaleidoscope when I was younger.

I thought stained glass myself.

Both awesome designs.

Jesse

[HappyCat]

Its a shame Extraholes image isnt aliased, and appears all jaggy. Smoother lines would sell it to me more, its a great design.

This is my favourite of the Archimage images too, so difficult vote here.

[extraholes]

Can I be the first to say congrats. Nice design, good luck on the next round, hey, may be you will get to face yourself again!

I did do my drawing in illistrator, but it is the old version and it was hard to fill in the colors, sorry for the jags.

extraholes

[:bag:]

Hey Sidepot, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease make the Oak Park available for purchase anyway.

[underwhelmed]

2nd that... I love the Oak Park Grand as well

[Magus 23]

Originally Posted by :bag:

Hey Sidepot, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease make the Oak Park available for purchase anyway.

Hear, hear. That design's got a lot of appeal, and I think it'd be a disservice to potential customers not to have it as an option.

[hico]

To Magus 23, Extraholes and Stephan (and everyone else) re. "Archimage" and "Oak Park" designs, both are very nice designs (very different) but equally well done. Both of these designs work well in all of the inlay sizes.
Here is a geoffffey idea:
Instead of building a set with progressive edge spots (the norm) what do you think about using a progresive inlay size theme?
3/4" for the lowest denom,
1" for the next denom,
grand for the next denom,
1 1/4 for the highest denom.
In the same set? or the other way around. Are there even four sizes avalible? Maybe a full face design for a NCV? Just an off the wall thought, but I'm haveing trouble visualizing this --- what do you think?