 | 
06-03-2008, 10:31 PM
|  | In the Money | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Lisle, IL Age: 29
Posts: 282
Chips: 234 | | | Efficiency Breakdown To be honest, I think my breakdown is good. I'm looking for some feedback to see if there are holes that need to be filled. I know color-ups could be tight but I want to get in the habit of using the larger chips more. Here are the objectives I'm trying to fulfill;
1) 1000 chips max
2) 27 player max
3) In my T7500 tourneys (blinds start 25/50) I only want 3 denoms in play for up to 24 players.
Breakdowns:
25-220
100-320
500-300
1000-120
5000-40
Stacks:
T7500
1-18 12/17/11
19-24 8/13/12
25-27 8/8/9/2
T10000
1-18 12/17/16
19-24 8/13/11/3
25-27 8/8/10/4
Thoughts? | 
06-04-2008, 10:52 AM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Downers Grove, IL Age: 45
Posts: 733
Chips: 1,153 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown Chris,
I currently like the ratio of 4-6-3-4-1 (25, 100, 500, 1000, 5000).
I think the 100's and 1000's are the workhorse chips. I think the 25's get out of play quickly (and players mostly bet the 100's). Likewise, I think players bet 1000's more than 500's.
In addition, having a higher ratio of 1000's to 500's gives you the option to support more players, deeper starting stacks, etc. if ever needed. And the difference in stack sizes between 2-500's or 1-1000 is minimal (1 chip).
So, while I'd like to have bigger stacks of 25's, etc. I found this to be a an efficient and economical approach.
This would make a 1000 chip set as:
Breakdowns:
25-220
100-330
500-170
1000-220
5000-60
Of course, you may want to tweak this to put quantities on the boundaries of 20's (or 100's) | 
06-04-2008, 11:28 AM
|  | In the Money | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Lisle, IL Age: 29
Posts: 282
Chips: 234 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown What do you have as the starting stacks with this breakdown? | 
06-04-2008, 11:45 AM
|  | World Series Champ | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Toronto Age: 29
Posts: 4,841
Chips: 2,986 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown Quote:
Originally Posted by mrticsay I think the 100's and 1000's are the workhorse chips. I think the 25's get out of play quickly (and players mostly bet the 100's). Likewise, I think players bet 1000's more than 500's.
In addition, having a higher ratio of 1000's to 500's gives you the option to support more players, deeper starting stacks, etc. if ever needed. And the difference in stack sizes between 2-500's or 1-1000 is minimal (1 chip). | Agreed.
How about starting stacks of 8-8-3-5 for T7500 (conveniently 3 stacks of 8), or 8-8-6-6 for T10,000. A good breakdown might be:
220 x T25
280 x T100
180 x T500
260 x T1000
60 x T5000 | 
06-04-2008, 01:15 PM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Downers Grove, IL Age: 45
Posts: 733
Chips: 1,153 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown Quote:
Originally Posted by mrcashflow What do you have as the starting stacks with this breakdown? | 27 T7500
8x25
8x100
5x500 6x500 for T10000
4x1000 6x1000 for T10000
18 T7500
12x25
17x100
9x500 8x500 for T10000
1x1000 4x1000 for T10000 | 
06-04-2008, 01:17 PM
|  | Final Table | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Downers Grove, IL Age: 45
Posts: 733
Chips: 1,153 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown Quote:
Originally Posted by mrticsay 18 T7500
12x25
17x100
9x500 8x500 for T10000
1x1000 4x1000 for T10000 | for more balanced stacks, try this
12x25
12x100
8x500 (9x500 for T10000)
2x1000 (4x10000 for T10000) | 
06-04-2008, 01:22 PM
|  | ChipTalk.net Article Writer | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: San Jose Age: 37
Posts: 1,621
Chips: 1,202 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown Quote:
Originally Posted by jdunford Agreed.
How about starting stacks of 8-8-3-5 for T7500 (conveniently 3 stacks of  , or 8-8-6-6 for T10,000. A good breakdown might be:
220 x T25
280 x T100
180 x T500
260 x T1000
60 x T5000 | Agree 8-8-6-6 or 8-8-8-5 for T10K
You will waste more if you use 12 for $25 bec the T25 will be color after the third level. I played T10K all the time. Here is my 8-8-8-5
Good luck... | 
06-04-2008, 02:54 PM
|  | In the Money | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Lisle, IL Age: 29
Posts: 282
Chips: 234 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown I definitely plan on buying the minimum 25s which is 220. I also prefer the idea of only 3 denoms in play for the usual group of 18 players. Therefore, I'm leaning towards following breakdown:
25-220
100-320
500-220
1000-200
5000-40
Thanks for the advice. | 
06-05-2008, 03:08 PM
|  | Creativity Alliance | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: 08033
Posts: 2,767
Chips: 825 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown droool........Mixed games racks 
By mizuchaud
12 T25 (T300)
7 T100 (T700)
2 T 500 (T1,000)
8 T 1000 (T8,000)
2 T 5000 (T10,000)
T20,000 in 31 pretty chips...
WSOP not showing that pretty T500 no love, what's up with that?!
(borrowed this from my own post from the WSOP thread...)
seemed on topic.
I had never thought of the T1000 being more of a workhorse than the T500 as I've only had one table of players. MTT's may have bigger needs due to the much higher stacks at the middle and end of tourneys....
So the closeness of the T500 to the 1K seems to make sense if you use MUCH less of the 500 and load up on the 1K chip. Then you get to color everything up for the cameras.....  | 
06-05-2008, 04:12 PM
|  | In the Money | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Lisle, IL Age: 29
Posts: 282
Chips: 234 | | | Re: Efficiency Breakdown They really skew the ratio of 500s to 1ks. Nice looking stacks. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off Chips Per Thread View: 0 Chips Per Thread: 6 Chips Per Reply: 1 | | | |  |