the online games are still good.

[jojobinks]

PokerStars Game #12058484950: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2007/09/14 - 18:07:05 (ET)
Table 'Cydonia' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: Sandviper23 ($192.90 in chips)
Seat 2: rainintime ($24.10 in chips)
Seat 3: Ehsays ($138.60 in chips)
Seat 4: underradar ($71.50 in chips)
Seat 5: Schemeny ($96.50 in chips)
Seat 6: onelarry ($103.05 in chips)
Seat 7: DEACON1949 ($91.25 in chips)
Seat 8: Tixmaster ($110.70 in chips)
Seat 9: thejojobinks ($111.75 in chips)
Tixmaster: posts small blind $0.50
thejojobinks: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to thejojobinks [As Ac]
Sandviper23: folds
rainintime: folds
Ehsays: folds
underradar: raises $14 to $15
Schemeny: folds
onelarry: folds
DEACON1949: folds
Tixmaster: folds
thejojobinks: raises $20 to $35
underradar: raises $20 to $55
thejojobinks: raises $56.75 to $111.75 and is all-in
underradar: calls $16.50 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [Th Ks Ah]
*** TURN *** [Th Ks Ah] [Jc]
*** RIVER *** [Th Ks Ah Jc] [2d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
thejojobinks: shows [As Ac] (three of a kind, Aces)
underradar: shows [8s 8h] (a pair of Eights)
thejojobinks collected $140.50 from pot
underradar said, "wellll"
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $143.50 | Rake $3
Board [Th Ks Ah Jc 2d]
Seat 1: Sandviper23 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: rainintime folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Ehsays folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: underradar showed [8s 8h] and lost with a pair of Eights
Seat 5: Schemeny folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: onelarry folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: DEACON1949 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Tixmaster (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: thejojobinks (big blind) showed [As Ac] and won ($140.50) with three of a kind, Aces

[rimmerryan]

Seat 4: underradar ($71.50 in chips)

Seat 9: thejojobinks ($111.75 in chips)

If both of you ended up going ALL-IN, then shouldn't the pot be bigger than $140.50 after the $3 rake?

Or am I missing something here...???


R.

[jdunford]

Originally Posted by rimmerryan

Seat 4: underradar ($71.50 in chips)

Seat 9: thejojobinks ($111.75 in chips)

If both of you ended up going ALL-IN, then shouldn't the pot be bigger than $140.50 after the $3 rake?

Or am I missing something here...???


R.

You're missing something here...

$71.50 × 2 = $143, + 50¢ SB = $143.50, - $3 rake = $140.50.

Now, if that was me with AA, all the other A's would've run and hid, and he would've spiked an 8 on the river to claim the pot. As I just ranted to someone else today, with the exception of taking the pot down pre-flop on several occasions, I've lost with AA in my last 12 consecutive hands with it - usually getting all my chips in pre-flop, although occasionally being called and then check-raise-reraising after an uncoordinated flop that someone hit hard, or having to fold on very dangerous (i.e. obvious flush/straight/KKK possibilities). But that's just me. I'm glad to see someone doesn't always lose with AA.

[Jiggs77]

71.5 x 2 = 143 - 3 = 140

Looks okay to me. Jojo's uncalled portion is return and not included in the final pot calculation.

[tomb1]

Yeah but your multiple raises meant you had something really strong . . . like pocket 7s!

[dad604]

Very nice. I had to take a 2nd look at the name, good thing it was underradar and not "underrated." I don't think I would want to play underrated...

I just switched over to NL from FL last few weeks. The FL games have been very tough nowadays. I find there are much, much more NL games and lots more fish too. I find FL boring now...Wish I had switch sooner... Either more fish at NL or I am just running hot.

[smoore]

wow. I mean, really... I guess he got into the whiskey before he started playing.

[200 Motels]

Also, 14x raise pf.

[Big Mike]

Originally Posted by jojobinks

underradar said, "wellll"

^^ My favorite part of the whole hand.