| Re: Progression and Denom Preference I did a modified progression using only the 3d14, 4d14, 6A14 and 614 options.
My main goal was to design each chip as it's own beautiful combination of colors. Second, I then tried to make sure that the chips worked together in groups of 3 denominations or variations of that theme. In addition, I did not at all rule out using the same color edge spot on many of the chips, so there are sometimes 3 chips that have one color repeat.
But the bottom line, each chip was it's own design.
I was complaining about this progression theme during both the group buy design phase as well as during the protege competition yet I felt that not one person was listening to my reasoning. Even more so with the bland color combinations that were being voted on so I just finally gave up and designed my own from top to bottom.
As I have a sample set from the original group buy from a member here, I think those chips had some very serious shortcomings color wise.
With the 18 chips that I designed for my own two custom sets, I used many Paulson and other historical examples for my color combinations. I also used an example from the BCC chips shown on the poker program which aired on INHD for two of my chips.
So, yes Viet, I see your point with the question. In my case, I designed two separate sets. One was a full range from $1 thru $25,000 and the other began at $500 and went up thru $25,000 for an add on tournament type set up. |