[Dwight87]

Originally Posted by boondocker96

Still not sure who to vote for...the sharpness of detail is sort of a big deal.
I know this wont be a popular statement, especially since I have yet to see them first hand, but the AB by NJ's seemed a bit blurry. The really was a loss of resolution in the image to chip transfer, IMO.
Wondering if this really is the case, and if so, can it be avoided by going with Casino Tek.
If not, no worries. Still count me in for 15-20.

I'll try to help you out here boondocker. If you read the last post by Matthew here: http://www.chiptalk.net/forum/viewto...=3665&start=25
He says he thought his casinotek sample was a chipco. The only real difference he noticed was a slightly lower weight and different mint mark. Although he didn't really mention about the graphics, he implied that there was no difference there between casinotek and chipco. That being said, our bounty chip graphic is just going to be large text and I don't think it makes that much difference visually if it's on casinotek or nj ceramics. Hope that helps.